Cesspool on the Potomac
Anti-Clinton backlash begins
Since Hillary Clinton's "surprise" New Hampshire win, the story in the U.S. Democratic presidential race has been Bill & Hill's two-headed, four-fisted attack machine and its success in slowing down Barack Obama. Today, there's evidence that the story is changing, and that a media backlash against the Clintons may be at hand.
Influential New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd lays bare the Clintons' bare knuckles today, arguing they'll stop at nothing to take down Obama and win the nomination.
"The Clintons — or 'the 2-headed monster,' as the The New York Post dubbed the tag team that clawed out wins in New Hampshire and Nevada — always go where they need to go, no matter the collateral damage. Even if the damage is to themselves and their party."
Closer to home, Gerard Baker rails in the Times against "Clinton Incorporated."
"And so when the upstart young black senator from Illinois attempted to lead something of a shareholders' revolt against the proposal, he met the full force of the Clintons' wrath. Bill Clinton has been unleashed on the Obama candidacy like an ageing but still ferocious pitbull let loose on an elegant but slightly diffident Great Dane."
If coverage is beginning to swing the way we suspect, the Obama campaign has to be pleased. Obama has started to aggressively fight back against the Clintons in a series of campaign stops, TV appearances, and in Monday night's debate.
The next couple of days leading to Saturday's South Carolina primary, which Obama is expected to win, should be revealing. An anti-Clinton backlash can only hurt the New York senator heading into the 22-state "Super Tuesday" primaries on Feb 5th.
